1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne respectively by each party.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is as follows, and the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing the instant case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding and using some contents or adding the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable as it is in accordance

2. Part 5, 6, and 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was added or added, "liability for compensation against the plaintiff by the defendant" shall be applied to "liability for compensation against the defendant by the plaintiff".

The evidence No. 6 of the judgment of the first instance shall be added to the evidence No. 1 of the 6th 21st son of the judgment of the first instance.

The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, 7:4-16 p.m., 16 p.m., “I cannot be said to have a large amount at the time of the instant accident,” shall be as follows: 1) The weather c.m. at the time of the instant accident is clear, and the asphalt surface was built. From January 7, 2014, the Plaintiff, D, and I, who are game assistants, had the DNA mark maintenance and repair work of this case conducted around 09:0, Jan. 7, 2014; D used approximately 15cm in length (ordinary DNA mark maintenance and repair work, but the f.m. is used at the time of the instant accident, and there is a need for a large amount of 1m in length in order to wear ice sand and to contain it.

In other words, the golf course EF No. 15 of the instant golf course was cut, fluent sand of the sand tank was put in a portable water tank, and the fluent is placed in a space below the head of the golf course, and both descendants fluent the sand above with the sand inserted, and fluent the sand above.

I was seated with sand in the back of the golf car driving seat.

The plaintiff was allowed to drive a golf car. The plaintiff notified D and I that he would be able to take the safety hand of the golf car, confirmed that he did not start the golf car, but start the golf car without doing so. The plaintiff driving the golf car at a speed of about 20km per hour and driving it at a speed of about 15 kilometers on the golf car which is packed as a asphalt.