1. All of the plaintiffs' lawsuits against the Chairman of the Board of Audit and Inspection shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs' defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 12, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed a civil petition with the Chairman of the Board of Audit and Inspection to the effect that welfare points received by public officials and soldiers (excluding private soldiers) are unfair as the pertinent public officials, etc. fail to report their income, despite that they are subject to taxation, and thus, they are subject to inspection.

B. From June 2, 2011, the Chairman of the Board of Audit and Inspection of the Republic of Korea and the Plaintiffs had been notified of the result of treatment by filing a civil petition identical or similar to the above two times, and subsequently repeatedly submitted the said civil petition without justifiable grounds, and the Plaintiffs’ aforementioned civil petition was terminated without any notification of the result of treatment on May 12, 2017.

C. Since then, the Plaintiffs are once again serving four times from June 5, 2017 to August 28, 2017 to the Chairman of the Board of Audit and Inspection of the Defendants.

A civil petition was filed with the same purpose as the statement in the paragraph, and the Chairman of the Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea

For the same reasons as described in paragraph (1), no notification of the result of disposal was made.

(hereinafter the above (hereinafter referred to as the “instant civil petition”), including the civil petition filed on May 12, 2017 and the civil petition filed on August 28, 2017, hereinafter referred to as the “two cases”). D.

On October 11, 2017, the Plaintiffs filed a petition with the Defendant Board of Audit and Inspection of the Board of Audit and Inspection of the Republic of Korea for a trial on the fulfillment of the duty to inspect duties to the Ministry of Strategy and Finance and the National Tax Service in accordance with each of the instant civil petitions (hereinafter “instant adjudication”). However, on November 8, 2017, the Defendant Board of Audit and Inspection of the Board of Audit and Inspection of the Republic of Korea rendered a ruling dismissing the petition on the ground that “the instant petition for adjudication is unlawful on the ground that it is not subject to administrative

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant adjudication”). [The grounds for recognition] did not dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 10 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence 1 through 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the plaintiffs' lawsuits against the Chairman of the Board of Audit and Inspection are legitimate or not, of this case against the Chairman of the Board of Audit and Inspection.