beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is the owner of land C and D in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the Defendant is the owner of land E and F (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”) in order.
B. Each of the above lands is located in the order of its number. From the time of 2014, the instant land C and E were equal to the instant land in a flat and balanced manner without a special boundary classification. The instant F and D land located below were also equal to one parcel, without a special boundary classification, and there was a bridge between E and F land.
C. Under the agreement by 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to cultivate the instant land C, E, F, and D as a shooting year, the Plaintiff and the Defendant grow up with the discussion. However, in the year 2015, each of their own land was cultivated.
Accordingly, the Defendant decided to cultivate the instant E and F land on his own, and ordered an engineer of sckes to store the boundary between the instant land and E land, and between March 2015 and April 2015, respectively, between the instant F land and D land.
E. The Plaintiff: (a) deemed that the ridge he stockpiled the instant land owned by the Plaintiff, and requested the Korea Land Information Corporation to conduct a survey on the boundary of each of the instant land; (b) on April 13, 2015, by a cadastral engineer, etc. affiliated with the said construction works; (c) on the basis of the result of the said survey, one unit was set up at the end of the boundary line of the instant land and the instant E land owned by the Defendant; and (d) one set up at the end of the boundary line of the instant land owned by the Defendant and the instant land owned by the Plaintiff.
F. As a result of the above survey, it was revealed that the Defendant: (a) the Dual between the instant F land and the D land was partially infringed upon the Plaintiff’s land; and (b) the Defendant extended the said Dual Road to the F land owned by the Defendant.