The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the defendant include the fact that the defendant confessions all of his/her crime and reflects his/her mistake, and that the victim does not want punishment against the defendant by mutual consent with the victim.

The crime of this case is a circumstance unfavorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant employed the victim as a female worker in the scket block, and then created a false prepaid payment claim by using the victim as a disabled person of class 2 with intellectual disability, and then selling the victim to the house and the sexual traffic business establishment in the house, and the fact that the crime of this case is not significantly good that the victim was detained in the motor vehicle for about 2 hours in order to let the victim again go beyond the victim to the sexual traffic business establishment, and that the victim seems to have suffered a big physical and mental pain due to the defendant's crime.

In addition, considering the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, circumstances, means and result of the crime, various sentencing conditions as shown in the arguments in this case, such as the situation before and after the crime, and the result of the application of sentencing guidelines by the Supreme Court Sentencing Committee, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.