A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On November 29, 2016, the Defendant, at around 20:45, was under the influence of alcohol in a “E” restaurant located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and was under the influence of alcohol, and was under the influence of alcohol, and was under the influence of the head on the glass door. The Defendant was under the influence of alcohol.

After that, when receiving emergency relief from the Victim F (F, 23 years old), who is the 119 first-aid member, who was called upon the report of the same fee, it was rhydddd to four times with the bucks inside the buckbucks and the embucks in accordance with the shocking desire.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the above victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, and H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the I;

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The following favorable circumstances):

1. The Defendant and his/her defense counsel on the assertion of mental and physical weakness under Article 16(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Crimes committed by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel appear to the purport that the Defendant would be in a state of mental and physical weakness at the time of the instant crime, considering the favorable circumstances in favor of the Defendant. However, the Defendant’s defense

However, in full view of all the circumstances such as the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the details and attitudes of the instant crime, and the Defendant’s conduct before and after the instant crime, etc., the Defendant had weak ability to discern things or make decisions due to the mental delay at the time of the instant crime.

It does not seem that it does not appear.

Therefore, the above argument is not accepted.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant did not receive a letter from the injured party, and that he committed an indecent act against the 112 first-aid crew member dispatched to assist the defendant, which is highly likely to be criticized.

However, the defendant made a confession to commit the crime of this case as the first offender and made a deep objection to it.