1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s KRW 3,00,000 and interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from October 21, 2015 to the date of full payment.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in the statements Nos. 1 and 3 and Nos. 2-6 and 12, the fact that the plaintiff lent KRW 3,00,000 to the defendant Eul on July 19, 2014 through D, and KRW 15,00,000 to the defendant C on May 30, 2014 without fixing the due date. The fact that the copy of the complaint of this case seeking the return was served on the defendants respectively is clear in the record.

As such, Defendant B is obligated to return each of the above loans to the Plaintiff. As to Defendant B is obligated to pay damages for delay at the rate of 15% per annum from October 21, 2015 to the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, which is obviously 15% per annum from October 21, 2015 to the date of full payment, Defendant C is obligated to pay damages for delay at the rate of 20% per annum from April 14, 2015 to September 30, 2015, which is obviously 20% per annum from the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case to September 30, 2015, and 15% per annum from the next day to the date of full payment, each of the claims against the Defendants of the Plaintiff are accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remainder of claims are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.