logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고단5837
전자금융거래법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2016 order 5837]

1. On September 2015, the Defendant transferred the access media used for electronic financial transactions by transferring the passbook and e-mail card to the company bank account (D) in the name of the third party in the name of the company bank account in the name of the third party in the name of the third party in front of the modern department store located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government. On September 2015, the Defendant transferred the access media used for electronic financial transactions by transferring the passbook and e-mail card of the company bank account in the name of the third party C received from the third party C.

2. On November 2015, around 2015, the Defendant transferred the access media used in electronic financial transactions by transferring the passbook and physical card of the national bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant-friendly E-mail, prior to the opening of the Internet illegal gambling site No. 3 times in Songpa-gu Seoul around November 2015, the Defendant transferred the access media used in electronic financial transactions.

[2016 Highest 7395] On August 2015, the Defendant sent to Kwikset service article a name-unckseter who operated the Internet illegal gambling site, prior to the opening of the entrance in Songpa-gu Seoul around 3, 2015, 40,000 won was sent from the Defendant’s account in the name of one bank account in the name of G (H) in the name of the Defendant’s wife.

Accordingly, the defendant transferred the passbook and e-mail card, which is a medium access to electronic financial transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Entry of each statement in the police interrogation protocol against C, E, or G;

1. Statement of each police statement made to I and J respectively;

1. Application of each Act or subordinate statute to inquire into details of transactions and replys on details of financial transactions;

1. Article 49 (4) 1 of the relevant Act and Article 6 (3) 1 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act (excluding punishment) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reasons for sentencing of Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, which are confined in the workhouse, are punished for the same crime prior to the instant case.

arrow