Defendant

All appeals filed by D and prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence imposed by the lower court (two months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of community service) is too unreasonable.

B. The victim U.S., upon the Defendant’s solicitation by the Defendant A, did not purchase each of the instant J apartment Nos. 104, 802, 106, 1103, 108, and 803, and the instant K apartment Nos. 105, and 1301, and paid 311,069,800 won with the purchase price, but did not pay the said money to the Defendant A to invest in the resale project of the apartment purchase right in the I district, which belongs to the Defendant A’s deception.

2) Defendant B’s 35,00,000 won paid to Defendant A by Defendant B is not the purchase price for the instant J apartment 108 dong 602, but the purchase price for the instant J apartment 108 dong 602, but the purchase right of Defendant A for the purpose of mediating the resale of the sale right during the period of restriction on resale. As such, Defendant B is recognized as having arranged the resale as stated in the instant facts charged in collusion with Defendant A. 2. 2) The sentence of imprisonment (6 months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of community service) imposed by the lower court on Defendant A is unreasonable as it is too

2. Determination

가. 검사의 사실오인 주장에 관한 판단 1) 피고인 A에 대한 사기의 점 가) 이 부분 공소사실 피고인 A은 사실은 피해자 U으로부터 I지구 내 아파트 분양권 전매에 대한 투자를 받더라도 고수익과 원금을 보장해 줄 의사나 능력이 없음에도 2009. 9. 20.경 피해자에게 “I지구 아파트 몇 채를 잡아놨는데 그 아파트에 투자하면 투자금을 두 배로 상환하겠다.”라고 거짓말하여 이에 속은 피해자로부터 같은 달 28.경 213,000,000원, 같은 해 10. 1.경 71,000,000원을 피고인 명의의 농협 계좌로 송금받고, 2010. 1. 21.경 피해자로 하여금 Y(주) 명의의 국민은행 계좌로 27,069,800원을 송금하도록 하여 합계 311,069,800원을 교부받아 이를...