logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고정1090
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who has worked as an adviser in A-A-A-A-A-A-A-A-B

1) On August 13, 2011, the Defendant made a false statement that it is urgently necessary to cost the golf course construction while eating at a restaurant located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu. However, the Defendant did not perform the golf course construction work, and there was no ability to do the golf course construction work. The Defendant was issued 3 million won’s cashier’s checks (one million won check 2, five million won check) from the victim, i.e., e., one million won check) at the victim’s seat. (2) On November 19, 2011, the Defendant displayed this letter of understanding of English concluded at the G coffee shop located in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, and concluded that “The need to bear expenses to attract foreign capital from duba”.

However, the defendant did not have the ability to attract foreign capital.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was issued seven million won cashier’s checks (one million won per five million won book, one million won per one) by the victim.

3) Around December 2011, the Defendant made a false statement that “it is necessary to call for customers at a hotel while showing a quotation in connection with the construction of the Gac Embassy in Seoul East-gu, Seoul.” However, the Defendant did not have any capacity or intent to build the Gac Embassy. However, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was issued 200,000 won’s cashier’s checks (2 100,000 won) from the victim. 4) around March 15, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement at the Nonghyup Bank in Gangdong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, that “A need to take expenses for gathering Saturdays from the Madsan-do.”

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to collect earth and sand.

As such, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 3 million from the victim to the post office account under his/her name, and received a total of KRW 13.2 million over four occasions before and after the issuance of the same.

Summary of Evidence

1...

arrow