The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) the Defendant did not state the victim the victim with the same words as the facts charged; and (b) the Defendant made such remarks.

Even if there was no possibility of spreading the victim-friendly job offers J and G, the lower court convicted the Defendant of the facts charged in this case. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and misapprehending the legal doctrine.

2. Determination

A. The lower court’s judgment based on the following circumstances, i.e., ① at the time of the instant crime, there were the Defendant, J, and G, and L and M, etc. at the first floor office located between the Defendant, J and G at the time of the instant crime, and L and M, etc. at the time of the instant crime, at the time of the instant office, at the first floor where the open door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door up to D2, but at the second floor such as mack door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door up to the Defendant’s end door door door, and

J, G only said remarks were made, but only the lower court witness G’s “N 40 or more personnel expenses have been incurred.”

I have the honor to memory because it is a Roman case, and to confirm it to E.

To bring an action through N, there must be grounds to do so. It is also necessary to do so.

If you want to be expelled from the Round, I would like to recommend the school to be removed.

Considering the statement, etc. in the lower court’s trial, “A” does not seem to have been in a close relationship between J and G, or to have been in a close relationship with the victim, and ③ even if J and G were in a friendly relationship with the victim as a motive for the victim and the university, they have the duty of care not to open out the Defendant’s statement of false facts against the victim, or that it naturally expected that the Defendant would not open to the outside.