logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2016.06.30 2016나50621
사해행위취소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 15, 2014, the Plaintiff leased KRW 50 million interest at 25% per annum to D (the same rate as damages for delay of principal and interest whose payment was delayed) and as of January 30, 2015, and at that time, C, the spouse of D, jointly and severally guaranteed D’s above loan obligations to the Plaintiff. (2) The Defendant leased KRW 50 million to C, the Defendant, the 26th and December 1, 2014, and the 1.5 billion interest to secure the loan obligations as of June 26, 2014, KRW 200,000,000,000,000 to the Defendant, and KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won (hereinafter “the instant apartment property”) on the list of apartment properties owned by C (the instant maximum debt amount); KRW 650,500,000,00,00).

(2) The amount of KRW 195 million is set off against the Defendant’s loan claims against C, and KRW 100 million is set off against the Defendant’s loan claims, and KRW 5 million is paid on the date of the contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

(2) The Defendant cancelled the second priority collective security on the grounds of termination on the same day on the day of the conclusion of the instant sales contract (Seoul District Court Decision 157, Jan. 2, 2015), and completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant apartment due to sale on the same day.

(No. 158 of the same date of receipt by the same registry office).

As of the time of conclusion of the instant sales contract, C’s active property and small property Nos. 1 of the appraised value shall be assessed, Changwon-si E.

arrow