A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a new character car.

On October 26, 2013, the Defendant driven a vehicle above 17:00 on 17:00, and made a turn to the left at three-lanes from the intersection to the lake from the intersection of the evis-gu, U.S. Simsan-do.

At this time, since there is a place where traffic control by signal apparatus is carried out, general vehicles other than buses are prohibited from left-hand turn, there was a duty of care to make a left-hand turn at the permitted point for left-hand turn.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and received the front part of the bus driven by D(45 years old) running along the bus exclusive lanes in the same direction from the intersection to the intersection by negligence of failing to make a left-hand turn in violation of the signal and driving it on the left-hand left-hand side of the said car.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F (the 43 years of age) who is the passenger of the above bus due to the foregoing occupational negligence, such as salt, tension, etc. of the trend that requires approximately three weeks medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A traffic accident report, a traffic accident report, an accident vehicle photograph, an intersection photograph;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted on the assertion of the defendant and defense counsel under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order. The defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the intersection in this case does not have a "Pton" mark and no left turn turn turn turn turn turn turn turn is permitted. Thus, the defendant did not violate

l.p. g., p.