1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

purport.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following additional parts, thereby citing this case in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【Additional Part】 Following the sixth 8th of the judgment of the first instance court, the following shall be added:

The defendant asserts that the completion of extinctive prescription is not allowed as an abuse of rights against the principle of good faith, since it is remarkably unfair and unfair to recognize the defendant's claim.

However, there is not sufficient evidence to acknowledge that the plaintiff's claim for the completion of extinctive prescription is against the principle of good faith or constitutes an abuse of rights by only the descriptions of the evidence No. 14 and No. 16, the above assertion is without merit.

2. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim is accepted on the grounds of its reasoning, and the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this conclusion, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.