beta
Text
The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 29, 2020, around 18:20, the Defendant brought a cell phone (LG), portable tape, tobacco, clothing, etc. with goods equivalent to KRW 100,000,00 in total, on the floor of the ridges in Bupyeong-do, Seocheon-ro, Seocheon-do, 9-1, Seocheon-do, Seocheon-do, Seocheon-do, Seocheon-do, and the northwest-do, and brought the victim’s yellow color recycling room in order to provide meals.
Accordingly, the Defendant stolen the property owned by the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (to track the course of movement of a suspect, C's statement that is the seat of a suspect, specific suspect, and comparative photograph immediately after committing a suspect) on the accused's statement in the police interrogation protocol B and each report on CCTV photographs to the accused in the court;
1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 329 of the Criminal Act that selects criminal punishment (the point of Section 329), and a fine of KRW 500,000 to suspend the sentence of fine selection;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (one day per fine, 100,000 won);
1. Article 59(1) of the suspended sentence of sentence of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act (Article 59(1) of the same Act provides that “A person who has been aware of the fact that all of the crimes in this case was led to confession and rebuttal of the defendant, the victim was not punished, and the defendant was forced to return the victim to the victim immediately after this mold.” Since there are no materials to see that the above assertion was false, the defendant's intent of unlawful acquisition is very weak, and the defendant is deemed to be very weak, due to the crime of interference with duties in 2017 and insult of a fine of KRW 1.5 million due to the crime of interference with official duties in 2017 and the crime of insult of a fine of KRW 3 million due to the crime of interference with the execution of official duties in 2018, there is no other criminal punishment, and considering that there is no record of punishment for larceny, the previous