logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.05.17 2016나309372
소유권말소등기
Text

1. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the pertinent part is modified or added as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts used or added;

A. Of the written judgment of the court of first instance, “B No. 7” was added to the “founded ground for recognition” column of Section 3, and “B” No. 13 and No. 14 was added to the “B” column of Section 5, and no specific statement was made with regard to the registration circumstances.”

B. The following is added to the third page 10 of the first instance judgment.

[On the other hand, the plaintiff argued that the registration of transfer of ownership in this case on the ground of sale on January 5, 1960, which was after January 1, 1960 on the ground of Article 3 of the Special Measures, is not subject to the Special Measures, but the purport of Article 3 of the Special Measures Act is not limited to the registration that is subject to the Special Measures, but the acquisition or loss of real right to real estate due to a juristic act before January 1, 1960, which was the enforcement date of the Civil Act, may lose its effect if it is not registered within six years from the enforcement date of the Civil Act, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 10 of the Addenda of the Civil Act, Article 10 of the Addenda of the Civil Act, that the acquisition or loss of real right due to a juristic act may lose its effect if it is not registered (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Da47992, Oct. 11, 196).]

3. Thus, the plaintiffs' claim against the defendant is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal against the plaintiffs is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow