The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. 공소사실 피고인은 2014. 2. 26.경 서울 강남구 D에 있는 피고인이 총책임자로 근무하는 ‘E’ 의류 및 액세서리 판매점에서 상표권자 샤넬사가 특허청에 액세서리류 등을 지정상품으로 하여 상표 등록한 샤넬 상표(등록번호 : 제304800호)와 동일한 상표가 임의로 부착된 가짜 샤넬 귀걸이 2개(이하 이 사건 귀걸이라 한다)를 판매할 목적으로 전시하여 상표권자의 상표권을 침해하였다.

2. Article 93 of the Trademark Act provides, “Any person who infringes on a trademark right and an exclusive license shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than seven years or by a fine not exceeding 100 million won.” Article 66(1)4 of the Trademark Act defines “an act of possessing, for the purpose of transfer or delivery of goods identical with or similar to the designated goods bearing another person’s registered trademark or any similar trademark” as an infringement of trademark rights. Article 2(1)7(b) of the Trademark Act defines “an act of transfer or delivery of goods bearing a trademark on goods or packages of goods, or display, export or import them for such purpose.”

따라서 이 사건에서 피고인이 샤넬 상표가 부착된 이 사건 귀걸이를 매장 진열대에 전시 또는 소지한 행위가 상표권 침해죄를 구성하기 위해서는 피고인에게 이 사건 귀걸이를 양도 또는 인도하려는 목적이 인정되어야 한다.

Comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly admitted and examined by this court, the bar code and the tag indicating the price list are attached to all goods sold in the “E” store operated by the Defendant. The instant ear is not attached to the instant ear, and the “E” mainly sells the clothing of low-priced and low-priced products, which are contained in the clothes. Such small products are directly sold in the Southern-gate Market, etc. by the store owner.