logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2021.02.17 2020고단7501
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaging in driving a rocketing taxi.

On July 23, 2020, the Defendant driven the above taxi on July 23, 2020, and driven the five-lane road in front of the Seosung City along the one-lane from the kingn Underground Road to the kingn Underground Road.

At the time of night, there was a cross-section where the front door of the road flows and a signal, etc. is installed. Thus, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to reduce the speed and to check whether the driver of the motor vehicle is a motor vehicle passing through the intersection by properly examining the right and the right of the road and to prevent the accident by driving the motor vehicle safely in accordance with the traffic signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to make a left turn on the front side of the Defendant’s driving of the victim D (the second part of the victim D (the second part of 43 years old) who entered the intersection of yellow mark to the lake park from the edge of the same marth by negligence, and received the front part of the victim D (the second part of the 43 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim by occupational negligence, such as the removal of the body body frame, which requires approximately 16 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. A survey report, a fire-proof report (as to B-Vehicles image), and a report on internal investigation (as to the analysis report of traffic accidents by the Road Traffic Authority),

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the Provisional Payment Order is that the Defendant’s negligence, which caused the instant traffic accident, is not weak, and that the degree of injury suffered by the victim is grave is disadvantageous to the Defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant recognized the crime of this case.

arrow