logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2016.04.01 2015고합267
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(운전자폭행등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 02:09 on July 24, 2015, the Defendant 2015 Gohap 267 left the F taxi operated by the victim E (68 years of age) from the D convenience store in Dongdaemun-gu Seoul on July 24, 2015, and paid the victim a fee by lending money to the above convenience store owner because he knows that there is no money to lose the wall.

Although the victim said that “Isle ... with the rear knife in sight of the knife,” the victim saw the horses “Isle ...” on the back knife of the said taxi, and 3 through 4 times the back string of the said taxi, and expressed the victim’s bath to the victim, and the victim proceeded with approximately 10 meters of the flife at the back knife of the said taxi, the victim’s face and chest was flifeed from the back knife of the said taxi, and then the victim sustained injury, such as a snow pool and open wound in the area surrounding the snow, which requires approximately 3 weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the driver of a vehicle in operation and caused the injury.

On January 4, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 22:50 on the 2016, when getting on and off a taxi driven by G, and was in front of Gwangjin-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the Defendant engaged in dangerous conduct that obstructs the operation of the said G, such as gathering the shot of the said taxi and extinguishing the meter; and (b) was urged from the police officer J (31) of the Seoul Mine-gu Police Station I Station, who called to the site after receiving a report on the said 112, to go home from the said police officer, who was called to the site, to take a bath without any justifiable reason; and (c) was frighted from the victim and the slope dispatched to the site with him to the patrol box, and assaulted the victim’s face on one occasion during the shot of the victim’s shot, who continued to have arrived at the I box even after having arrived.

As a result, the defendant interferes with the police officer's legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression of crime and 112 reporting and processing, and at the same time, he/she needs to give approximately two weeks medical treatment to the victim.

arrow