logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2021.02.18 2020고정673
과실치상
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. A person who supplements the facts charged shall have the duty of care to prevent any person from putting a dog into or out of a dog in order to prevent him/her from sustaining any person around the dog;

Nevertheless, on June 7, 2020, the Defendant, at around 15:30 on June 7, 2020, failed to install safety devices, such as cutting a line of a dog raised by the Defendant on the back side of the Gyeonggi-si apartment B apartment C, or cutting the dog to a dog, and caused the Defendant to suffer injury to the Defendant’s animal stuffing that requires approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 266 (2) of the Criminal Act;

(c) Expression of intention not to punish: Submission of a written agreement after the prosecution of this case;

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow