A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

Punishment of the crime

On July 14, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the execution of the sentence was terminated at the Seoul Southern District Court on November 22, 2012. On May 31, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for the same crime at the Seoul Southern District Court, 1 year and six months of imprisonment for the same crime at the Seoul Southern District Court on June 16, 199, 1 year and six months of imprisonment for the same crime, and 2 years of suspended execution for six months of imprisonment for larceny from the Southern District Court branch of the Seoul Southern District Court on January 14, 199.

At around 01:00 on March 6, 2013, the Defendant, at the “D” store located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, sought a theft of the victim’s cash by opening the front door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door door, opening the cash receipt and disbursement machine located in the carter, and using bactes, etc., and then, attempted to steal the victim’s cash, but failed to do so.

In addition, from the end of December 2012 to July 12:30, 2013, the Defendant committed an attempted theft or theft of another person’s property over a total of eight occasions, such as the list of crimes, from the end of July 5, 2013.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stolen another's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the prosecution against the F;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officer in G;

1. Each police statement made to H and I;

1. Each statement of E, J, K, L, M and N;

1. A ledger for the purchase of each on-site photograph and each gold;

1. Previous conviction: A written reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (applicable to repeated crimes under the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, and confirmation of habituality);

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness, taking into account the records of each crime, the number of crimes, the frequency of crimes, and the number of repeated crimes of the same kind in the judgment;

1. Article 5-4 (6) of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, Articles 329, 330, and 342 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (including inclusive) of the relevant Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Sentence of a punishment by law;