logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.07.12 2017고단2572
마약류관리에관한법률위반(향정)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

1. Crimes committed on February 2, 2017;

A. On February 2, 2017, the Defendant received, without compensation, the amount equivalent to the size of half of rice ampers (i.e., one philopopon; hereinafter “philopon”) from a person with no name (i.e., one gramlopon”; hereinafter “Wlopon”) in Ansan-si, Ansan-si.

B. On the same day, the Defendant: (a) opened the Defendant’s GMW car parked in the underground parking lot of the building F in Ansan-gu, Ansan-si; (b) opened the amount of a half-scale size of philophone rice, which was possessed in the same manner as Paragraph (a) above, on the gambling ground; and (c) administered phiphones by using a rophone as soon as possible by advertising the bottom thereof.

2. The crime committed against Staff on April 2017.

A. On April 2017, 2017, the Defendant received, without compensation, the amount equivalent to the size of half of the philopon rice from the deceased (E), in D as described in paragraph (a) of Article 1 of the Police Officers Act (hereinafter “E”).

B. The Defendant, who was parked in the place specified in paragraph 1-B of the same day at the Defendant’s GW car located in the place specified in paragraph 1-B of the same day, opened a large amount of half-scale size of philophone rice strings on the gambling ground, and administered philophones by using the string by promptly turning the bottom into a string.

3. Crimes on May 12, 2017;

A. On May 12, 2017, the Defendant received, without compensation, the amount equivalent to the degree of half of the half of the philopon rice from a person who was killed in the name (E), in D as described in paragraph (a) of Article 1 of the Act.

B. On the same day, the Defendant administered a dose in the same manner as Paragraph 1(b) of Article 1, in the Defendant’s GW car parked at the place indicated in Paragraph 1(b) in the manner as Paragraph 1(b).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each letter of narcotic appraisal;

1. Articles 60(1)2 and 4(1) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc., respectively, concerning criminal facts.

arrow