A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 17, 2017, at around 04:30, the Defendant received a 112 report on “her face” in front of the building B in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, B, and requested from D to move to the district for the investigation of the assault case between the Defendant and the other party to the assault case, and the Defendant received a request to move to the district for the investigation of the assault case by the Defendant and the police officer of the Republic of Korea during the move.

“In doing so, I assaulted D’s face to drink once.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendations given in the sentencing guidelines] - The basic area (fe.g., interference with the performance of official duties and coercion of duties) (fe., June 1 to June) (f.g., the sentence decision] - The degree of assault is not somewhat unfavorable: The degree of assault is not easy. - favorable normal circumstances: the defendant recognizes the crime and the defendant is the primary offender.