beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On December 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. by the District Court of the Republic of Korea on December 17, 2014, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 14, 2015.
1. From October 16, 2014 to October 21, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 00:20 on October 17, 2014, the following day, at the “D” point operated by the victim C in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant ordered the victim to take an order of alcohol and alcohol equivalent to the sum of KRW 65,000,000, including 100,000, 100,000, 15,000,000,000, when the victim believed as he/she had the ability to pay food.
However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the above food cost.
As such, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with alcohol and food, and did not pay 65,000 won of the price, acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.
2. From Oct. 17, 2014 to Oct. 02:30, 04, the Defendant ordered an alcoholic beverage with an alcoholic beverage with an amount of KRW 245,000, which is equivalent to KRW 245,00,00, in the case of an alcoholic beverage with an alcoholic beverage with an alcoholic beverage with an alcoholic beverage with an alcoholic beverage with an amount of KRW 180,00,00, inasmuch as the Defendant believed that the Defendant had the ability to pay food for himself/herself, the Defendant ordered the Defendant to do so.
However, the defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the above food cost.
As such, the defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with alcohol and food, and did not pay 245,000 won, acquired economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A written statement of C and F;
1. A comprehensive investigation report;
1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal history records, circular records, Konet case search and outputs, and application of statutes to judgment;
1. Relevant Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;
1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 of the Criminal Code to treat concurrent crimes.