logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.08.22 2017고단707
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than four months and by a fine not exceeding 200,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act on January 16, 2017, at the D police station of Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Jeju, the government office located in Jeju, on January 16, 2017. In relation to the fact that the Defendant was a taxi engineer and the sibly paid the taxi fee due to the payment of the taxi fee while under the influence of alcohol, she was called “Ssibags of Kaba”

I am special, I am special, because I am special, I am special

내가 뭘 잘못했는데 여기 있어야 되냐

They made a large voice, and refused to return home, and dypoused on the floor of the hand, such as bullying and bullying.

Accordingly, the defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, forced or scamed by very rough words and conducts at government offices.

2. On January 16, 2017, around 03:15, the Defendant: (a) arrested the Defendant in a flagrant act at the place described in paragraph (1) above; (b) around 01:23 on the same day; (c) on suspicion of violation of Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, public officials belonging to the police station belonging to the Jeju Western Police Station; (d) arrested the Defendant as a victim F (34 years of age) who is a public official belonging to the police station belonging to the same police station; and (e) whether the Defendant tried to wear the Defendant in a detention room of the police station located in the Jeju Eastern Police Station in the Jeju East Police Station.

“Along with the above victim’s left hand, the victim was injured by the number of days of treatment by shouldering the victim’s fright hand, etc., in order to prevent the Defendant from spreading high height, and to control and lock the Defendant.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the escorting of the suspect arrested by assault and inflicted injury on the victim at the same time.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to CCTV photographs, damaged photographs, written confirmation of medical treatment, and written inquiry about facts;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with the performance of official duties), and Article 3 (3) 1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (the point of interference with the cancellation of official duties);

1. The Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act.

arrow