logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.09.04 2017나35739
손해배상(기)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be principal lawsuit and counterclaim.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the judgment, is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding the following: “Although the defendant’s assertion that the details of cash deposited in the bank account in the name of the defendant, particularly the defendant’s father, deposited the money received as wages by J, the defendant’s father, etc., was not fully explained with the witness K’s testimony, etc., it is difficult to readily conclude that the money deposited as above is in favor of the defendant’s embezzlement of the money that the money deposited in the above circumstance (no evidence proves that the plaintiff’s embezzlement was attested due to the witness’s testimony, etc. by the witness of the court of first instance) is added.” Thus, this is cited as it is in accordance

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal against the principal lawsuit and counterclaim is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow