The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the purport of the Defendant’s grounds of appeal (e.g., the Defendant’s mistake is against each other, the Defendant committed each of the instant crimes with drinking alcohol and contingently, and the Defendant’s occupation that mainly counters women when completing sexual assault treatment programs, etc., the Defendant’s punishment ordering orders to complete sexual assault treatment programs for one year and 40 hours is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case during the period of repeated crime, the nature of the crime is not good, the damage recovery was not performed until the trial is the case. The defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by the District Court on March 11, 2014, and the defendant was punished for fraud, larceny, etc. There are many records of criminal punishment. Considering the motive and background of each of the crimes of this case, the circumstances before and after the crime of this case, the degree of damage, and other various matters prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, which are the conditions for sentencing, such as the records of this case and the defendant's character and behavior, and the environment, the court below's punishment is not determined unreasonable even considering the circumstances asserted in the grounds for appeal. Thus, the above assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (6) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that there is no ground for appeal for conclusion. It is so decided as per Disposition

However, since it is obvious that "AL" is a clerical error in "X", the judgment of the court below shall be corrected ex officio pursuant to Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure.