logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.08.28 2015고단2112
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 3, 2014, the Defendant did not think that the fact was used for the purchase of drugs distributed in low faith even if she borrowed money from the victim B, and at the time, the Defendant thought that the Defendant would use the funds borrowed from the victim for the repayment of the Defendant’s obligation to pay the Defendant’s interest, and did not have the intent or ability to pay the profits therefrom. However, even though the Defendant did not have the intent or ability to pay the Defendant’s interest on the Defendant’s personal obligation, the Defendant sold and sold the funds at the price of 70% of the fixed price by distributing the Defendant “MMW” to the Defendant’s “if the said international contractual drug sells the funds to purchase them at the price of 20% of the sales price, the Defendant would receive 20% of the sales price as allowances, and the remainder shall be paid from the victim as profits.”

5. 3,000,000 won, and the same month.

6. 2,00,000 won, 3,000,000 won on the 10th of the same month, 2,000,000 won on the 11th of the same month, 5,00,000 won on the 21th of the same month, 23th of the same month, 25,000,000 won on the 25th of the same month, 28th of the same month, 200,000 won on the 31st of the same month, and 42,80,000,000 won on the 4,00,000,000 won on the 31st of the same month, and on the 4,00,000,000 won on the 11st of the same month, were delivered for purchase price through a new bank account in the name of the defendant.

2. On December 8, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around Seoul or Gu Council members; (b) even if he/she borrowed money from the said victim, he/she did not think of the fact that he/she used it for the repayment of school loan; and (c) at the time, the Defendant thought that he/she would use the money borrowed from the victim for the repayment of the Defendant’s interest on the Defendant’s obligation; and (d) did not have the intent or ability to repay the said money, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “if he/she borrowed money, he/she would use it for the repayment of the school loan loan loan; and (e) would immediately repay it by opening the passbook.” (b) At that time, the Defendant was able to do so from the victim.

arrow