1. The defendants are jointly and severally attached to the plaintiffs.

1. The phrase “amount of compensation” in the “amount of compensation” is written.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) project approval and public notice - Industrial complex development project approval (F) - G on April 21, 2014; G on August 28, 2014; H on January 29, 2015; and I on January 29, 2015; Defendants:

B. The Gyeonggi-do Local Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on April 20, 2015 (hereinafter “instant adjudication of expropriation”) - Persons eligible for expropriation, and compensation for expropriation: Attached Form

1. The phrase "land" and the phrase "amount of compensation for expropriation" are the same as the phrase "land" and "amount of compensation for expropriation."

(The date of expropriation: - An appraisal corporation on May 20, 2015 - An appraisal corporation: the Pacific appraisal corporation, the Pacific appraisal corporation, the Gail appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal for expropriation”) and the appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal for expropriation”), and the result of appraisal is referred to as “appraisal for expropriation”).

C. The Central Land Tribunal rendered an objection on September 17, 2015 (hereinafter “instant objection adjudication”) - Details of the objection adjudication: Attached Form

1. The details of compensation are the same as the statement "amount of compensation for objection".

- An appraisal corporation: An appraisal corporation with respect to a stock company and the Korea Appraisal Board (hereinafter referred to as the “appraisal for an objection,” and the result of the appraisal is referred to as the “appraisal for an objection”) [based] without dispute; Gap evidence 1 through 6; Gap evidence 2-1 through 6; Gap evidence 3-1 through 3; Gap evidence 4-1 through 3; Gap evidence 5-1 through 14; Eul evidence 1-2; Eul evidence 1-2; Eul evidence 2-1 and 2-2; the purport of the whole pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion 1) The plaintiffs' assertion appraiser unfairly underassessment of the compensation for losses of each of the lands of this case. The defendants jointly and severally pay the plaintiffs the difference between the reasonable compensation for losses and the compensation for losses under the court's appraisal. 2) The defendants' assertion that the administrative conditions of each of the lands of this case are consistent with the comparative standard, but they are consistent with the appraisal of this case.