logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2017.08.24 2016나61000
약정금
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended by this court, is modified as follows.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. C has children under the former wife J, K and sus, other than Defendant and E, under the chain of D and E, and E has the Plaintiff under F and sus, and the Plaintiff and the Defendant are between F and C.

B. The Plaintiff’s reference E died in around 1994, and C died on March 15, 200.

The Defendant and the Plaintiff’s legal representative F agree to divide the legal property of their parents (C, D) into one another.

The Defendant, as the Plaintiff

1. The defendant's share (1/3) in the G parcel in Gyeonggi-do; 1/2;

2. Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Hoeng C, 203

3. The full amount of the registration fees for universities and colleges when the plaintiff enters universities and colleges (unpaid at the time of students);

4. The plaintiff will have 40,000,000 won in cash (g0,000 won) and is under the name of her mother (D) to the defendant.

1. It shall force the Suwon-si Pream Zone I.

The plaintiff and the legal representative F cannot legally require the defendant to transfer his/her property portion because his/her parent's property (C/D) has been fully distributed to the defendant.

Provided, That real estate currently in the name of a drifter (C) shall be excluded from real estate.

In addition to the above property calculation, if the property or financial industry of the financial property is considerably severe, the notarized part shall be null and void.

C. On July 31, 2006, when the Plaintiff was a minor, the Plaintiff’s legal representative parent F and the Defendant drafted the following agreements (hereinafter “instant agreement”).

(However, the portion seen as a simple clerical error shall be corrected and stated, and the phrase in the actual agreement shall be written in each note).

After the agreement of this case was reached, the Defendant ordered the Plaintiff (or Plaintiff’s mother F) to KRW 47,00,000,000 in cash and KRW 40,000 in the purchase price under the name of the Plaintiff (or Plaintiff’s mother F) and D (the Defendant’s mother) of Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government HFC 203.

On January 2013, 2013, UTS 12, 2014, UTS 12, 2014, including admission fees for 4,386,000, Hanu University 4,386,000, non-high- or high-income Australia educational institution for the Semesters 1 semester 1,2010.

arrow