1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part of the conjunctive claim by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiff (appointed party).

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff (Appointed Party; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is each owner of D. D. D. D. 94.1 square meters, B. The Appointer B is the above E. 239.7 square meters, and the Appointer C is the above F.71.3 square meters (hereinafter “each of the above land”).

B. On April 7, 2014, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do publicly announced the H District as the cadastral resurvey project district, including each of the instant land, as G public announcement of Gyeonggi-do (hereinafter “instant cadastral resurvey project”); on March 28, 2017, the Defendant confirmed the boundary of the instant cadastral resurvey project.

C. On April 10, 2017, the Defendant, following deliberation and resolution by the Osan City Cadastral Resurvey Committee (hereinafter “instant deliberation and resolution”), requested the central appraisal corporation and one stock company to conduct appraisal and assessment for calculating the amount of land adjustment in the instant cadastral resurvey district on April 12, 2017.

Each appraisal corporation above shall conduct an appraisal from April 14, 2017 to April 21, 2017, and completed the appraisal as of April 21, 2017.

On May 2, 2017, the Defendant publicly announced the completion of the cadastral resurvey project of this case as I publicly announced on May 2, 2017.

E. On August 21, 2017, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff and the designated parties of the amount of adjustment for the cadastral resurvey of each of the instant land as follows. Each of the above notice reached each Plaintiff and the designated parties on August 24, 2017.

(hereinafter “each disposition of this case”). The price adjustment amount per square meter (amount of appraisal) per square meter (amount of 8.7 1,335,500 11,618,800 Plaintiff AD7.11,355,500 9,482,00 GaF9.3729,50 6,784,300 GaF9.3729,50 6,784,300

F. The Plaintiff and the designated parties filed each objection (hereinafter “instant objection”) against each of the instant dispositions to the Defendant on July 19, 2017 (Plaintiff A), August 7, 2017 (Appointed Party B), and October 25, 2017 (Appointed C). However, the Defendant raised an objection on December 28, 2017.