Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On March 26, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Gyeyang District Court, and on October 17, 2013, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million as the same crime at the Sungnam Branch of Suwon District Court.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-cruise vehicle in accordance with the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents.
At around 18:02 on February 9, 2020, the Defendant was driving the said car in front of the 18 Gama Tunnels-dong Gi-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu in the direction of Sungnam-do in the direction of Sungnam-do.
At the time of night and a large number of vehicles are in progress at the front door, so there were duty of care to ensure safe operation by thoroughly manipulating the steering and steering gear and accurately operating it in a state of non-toxicity for the driver of a motor vehicle.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol level 0.091%, was negligent by neglecting it and making it difficult, found the victim C(76 years of age) Dacop typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ typ of the said car.
Ultimately, the Defendant sustained injury to the victim, such as “infection, tension, etc.,” which requires three weeks’ medical treatment due to occupational negligence.
2. On February 18, 2020, the Defendant driven the pertinent cruise car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.091%, from around 8km-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si to the road adjacent to the E market in Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-gu to the 18m-gu, Sungnam-gu, Sungnam-si, Jungnam-gu, Jungnam-gu.
Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. Preparation of the defendant's legal statement C