logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2015.10.30 2015고단819
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On September 27, 2010, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act from the Gunsan Branch of the Jeonju District Court on September 27, 2010, and on January 8, 2013, the same court issued a summary order of KRW 1.5 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act to a fine of KRW 1.5 million.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 08:30 on June 26, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a BM5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.143% from the 2km section from the front of the 2km-dong, the YY-si, the YY-si, the YY-si, the YY-si, the YY-si, the 2km-dong, the YY-si, the 2km-dong,

2. The Defendant is a person engaging in driving service of the BMF5 vehicle volume.

On June 26, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at around 08:30 on June 26, 2015, and driven the road of the first line in front of the D cafeteria located in Gunsan City, Gunsan City, along the street from the horizontal restaurant to the Emphian conference.

In such cases, the driver of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering system, brakes, and other devices of the motor vehicle, and to prevent accidents in advance by reporting the traffic situation well and driving safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.143% and proceeded as it is, and the Defendant shocked down the speed-prevention signboard, which is the ownership of the victim military city located on the right side of the passenger car driving direction, into the front part of the passenger car driving ahead.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, destroyed the above speed 280,000 won for repair costs, and escaped without immediately stopping and taking necessary measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of the crackdown on drinking driving, and the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Investigative Report (Calculation of Madmark),

arrow