logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2017.04.25 2017고단94
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On March 26, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for habitual larceny at the Daegu District Court on March 26, 2015 and completed the execution of the sentence at the Daegu Prison on August 23, 2016.

[Criminal facts. <201; 2017; 2017; 94, the Defendant, around March 10, 2017; 2017; 2017; 3.00, at the “D Beauty Room” located in Dao-si around 14:0 on March 10, 2017; 3.0, the beauty room business owner, saying, “humbling to do so,” and he sits in a sofa, and the above business owner, who took part in a sofa, took part of the victim’s head E by taking advantage of the gap in which both the above business owner and the victim’s care was neglected, 80,000 won in cash and identification cards, etc. within the bank owned by the victim.

In other words, they stolen them.

On October 30, 2016, the Defendant concealed and stolen it at the victim G H convenience store located in Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do, on October 18, 2016, at the victim G H convenience store, using the difference in the victim's management negligence.

Summary of Evidence

.2017 order 94

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;

1. E statements;

1. Each investigation report (No. 2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 16, 17 No. 17)

1. Protocols of seizure and list of seizure, protocol of seizure, etc.;

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Statement of the police statement related to G;

1. Each investigation report (Nos. 3 and 4 in the list of evidence);

1. Search and seizure inspection warrant and reply;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, and an investigation report (No. 21 of the evidence list No. 2017, proviso 94);

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime;

1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;

1. Grounds for sentencing of Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 (Aggravation of concurrent Crimes with Punishment for Theft against Victims E with a heavier penalty) of the Criminal Act by aggravation of concurrent Crimes;

1. The scope of punishment recommended according to the sentencing criteria (the type of each decision) shall be stolen;

arrow