1. The defendant shall pay 40,295,000 won to the plaintiff and 20% per annum from July 18, 2013 to the day of complete payment.

1. The parties asserted that the Plaintiff supplied human resources to the Defendant’s construction site (the Korea Agency for the Construction of the Korea Agency for the Chungcheong Innovation City) and sought payment of the said personnel expenses (the total wage of KRW 40,295,00 for KRW 447, Apr. 1, 2013 to July 9, 2013). The Defendant asserted that, as the Plaintiff supplied human resources to the Choyang Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Support Development”), the development of Choyang should pay the said personnel expenses.

2. Determination

A. (1) On July 19, 2012, the Defendant subcontracted reinforced concrete construction works among the new construction works of the technical-standard factory building prior to the Korea Development Institute.

(2) The development was supplied with the Plaintiff, who supplied human resources under the trade name “B human resources placement service” around that time, with the human resources supply at the above construction site (daily workers).

(3) Since October 2012, the Plaintiff did not pay wages to the Plaintiff from time to time, and the Plaintiff decided to suspend the supply of human resources at the above construction site on March 2013, and began to supply them again. From April 1, 2013 to July 9, 2013, the Plaintiff supplied 447 human resources to the above construction site and the wage for that was KRW 40,295,000.

(4) When the Plaintiff provides a seal to the construction site at the above site, the Plaintiff prepared a written confirmation of work log in the form of the list indicating the name of the seal department and the content of the work on the day. Before March 5, 2013, the Plaintiff signed a written confirmation of work log development at the bottom of the written confirmation of work log preparation of the Plaintiff, but the Defendant confirmed and signed the name of the seal department and the content of the work after March 5, 2013.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence No. 1 (including each number), witness C and D's testimony, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant recognized that he directly supervised and supervised the Plaintiff’s human body since March 5, 2013, and the Defendant directly managed the entire construction site.