beta
Text
1. The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 23,267,00 and the interest rate of KRW 20% per annum from February 28, 2014 to the day of complete payment.
Reasons
1. In light of the following facts and circumstances, in light of the fact that there is no dispute between the parties to a judgment on the cause of claim, and the overall purport of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, it is reasonable to deem that the price for goods that the plaintiff has to receive from the defendant remains KRW 23,267,000, based on November 13, 2013. As such, the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiff damages for delay at the rate of KRW 20% per annum under the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings, which is the day following the delivery date of the complaint in this case, from February 28, 2014 to the day of full payment.
① From September 3, 2012 to May 23, 2013, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with yellow dust, rats, etc.
② On July 23, 2013, the Defendant entered the name of the Defendant at the lower end of the following content indicated in the Plaintiff’s “Transaction (Evidence A)” into the lower end of the same content, and the Defendant’s seal is affixed on the side of the Defendant’s name.
- - The following shall be repaid in installments from 34,467,00 won on July 23, 2013, from 8/15 to 23:
(3) The lower part of the above description shall contain the following:
- Following - deposited on October 10, 2013 5,00,000 29,467,000 deposited on October 16, 200 3,200,267,267,000 deposited on November 13, 200
2. The defendant's assertion that the defendant cannot trust the above transaction document and thus cannot respond to the plaintiff's claim. However, even if the defendant's calculation details or entries are different from the facts as alleged by the defendant, such circumstance alone cannot be deemed as being trustable even after July 23, 2013, which was written by the defendant in writing, since the defendant cannot be deemed as being able to believe the whole contents. Thus, the defendant's assertion is rejected
(C) The plaintiff's claim is justified and acceptable. (3) The plaintiff's claim is justified. (4) The plaintiff's claim is justified. (3) The plaintiff's claim is not a separate objection against the contents after July 23, 2013.