The Defendants jointly share KRW 43,00,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from February 22, 2016 to November 12, 2020.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a copyright holder of a computer program, such as D (Gu, E), and F, which is a program that provides sembble modeling, mti-CAD function, and a program that provides digital Formula 1.

Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is equipped with 28 employees, 4.2 billion employees, 4.2 billion employees, 4 processing equipment, and 10 computers, and Defendant C is the representative director of the Defendant Company.

B. Defendant C, by the competent investigation authority around February 22, 2016, means unlawful reproduction or destruction of the secrets of the commercial software applied by prevention of reproduction or registration technology, etc., in which the Plaintiff’s “G” program and one H” program (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “instant program”) in the Plaintiff’s copyright is applied;

The Defendants were aware of the fact that the instant program was downloaded to the Defendant Company’s computer through the NAB knowledge white and Gap evidence No. 5, and around November 25, 2016, the Defendants were punished by a fine for violation of the Copyright Act as to the said act.

(The Daejeon District Court Branch Decision 2016 High Court Decision 2757 case, hereinafter referred to as the “instant criminal case”). C.

Unlike the installation of a program through a normal process, approximately 50 individual program chains, such as attached Form 1, are installed as is, and the program is installed in the non-party I’s computer of the defendant company, and the track program is installed in the same way as it downloads the installation files illegally opened online.

For example, “J”, “K”, and “L” among the instant programs are designed and individually sold in the relevant industries, and their multiple functions overlap.