1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 5, 2012, Plaintiff A is a person who received knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee gne, and Plaintiff B and C are children.

B. On December 207, 2007, Plaintiff A, who was born in 1931, was diagnosed with tuberculosis infection and was administered as an external surgery at the Defendant hospital. At the time, Plaintiff A received a serious brain fluorial chroscopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic.

(Visits: 30 to 27 points are divided into normal, 25 to 26 points, and 15 points for disabilities (Mini-Investment) and 0 points for CDR dementia test as normal, 0.5 points, if the number is 0.0 points, 3.0 points for early dementia, 2.0 points for early dementia, and 3.0 points for severe dementia.

(Clinia de Regulatory) was 1.0 points.

C. On September 8, 2010, Plaintiff A complained of a sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule sule.

Accordingly, the medical personnel of the defendant hospital decided to conduct an operation against the plaintiff A during the duration of the operation.