1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 14,075,717; (b) KRW 5,127,605; and (c) KRW 5,127,605, and each of the said money to Plaintiff A, from April 28, 2014 to April 2016.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C are D Freight cars around 20:55 on April 28, 2014 (hereinafter “Defendant Vehicle”).

) On the part of the driver’s failure to properly perform the duty of safe driving, such as reducing the speed on the sloping road and operating the steering direction and operating the brakes properly, the sub-section 17.6 km point of the Shicheon-gu, Kucheon-gu, Samcheon-gu, Seoul at the 17.6 km point of the Hacheon-gu Seoul Highway along the Hacheon-gu Seoul Highway along the Hacheon-do Highway along the Hacheon-gu Seoul Highway along the main line of the ManJC at the Hacheon-dong Highway (Seoul Metropolitan Highway) due to the driver’s failure to properly perform the duty of safe driving, which is due to the failure to reduce the speed on the sloping road, the two-lanes of the above Highway, which are four-lanes of the roads, are turned down into the front part on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and then the central

(2) Plaintiff A and B were accompanied by the Defendant’s vehicle, which was returned to the company to return home with Plaintiff A and B, and the instant accident occurred, and Plaintiff A suffered bodily injury, such as open light light, non-alley, etc., Plaintiff B suffered bodily injury, the right side of which, and the Plaintiffs received temporary layoff benefits and disability benefits from the Korea Workers’ Compensation and Welfare Service due to the instant accident.

3) The defendant is a mutual aid business operator who has entered into a motor vehicle mutual aid agreement with respect to the defendant's motor vehicle (applicable to recognition: The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence 1 through 4 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul's evidence 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

B. According to the facts of recognition of liability, the defendant, who is the mutual aid business operator of the defendant's vehicle, is liable to compensate the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case, unless there is any special reason under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act.

C. However, according to the evidence above, the plaintiffs are also on board the three vehicles with the fixed number of three persons on the expressway and fasten the safety belt.