The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for three years.

No. 1 of the date of seizure (No. 1 of the certificate).

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the original court’s imprisonment (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. We examine ex officio prior to the judgment on the grounds for appeal by the defendant.

On November 4, 2013, the prosecutor found the facts charged in the instant case that “the Defendant was parked on the road front of the Yudio at Yudio.” On the part of the victim Z, the Defendant opened a blusium and removed the blusium so that the blusium can be wided into the back glass window of the driver’s seat and then removed the blusium from the front blusium. The Defendant opened the blusium and removed the blusium glass from the front 450,000 won of the market value owned by the victim blusium and removed the blusium from the front blusium and the front blusium 10,000 won of the market value of the blusium 20,000 won of the blusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium 13.

3. The judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing, on the grounds of ex officio reversal as seen above, and it is again decided as follows.