The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The gist of the grounds for appeal (the factual error and inappropriate sentencing)

A. The Defendant did not commit each of the crimes stated in the instant facts charged.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (eight months of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, and two years of probation) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The court below affirmed that each of the crimes of this case was committed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence that the statements of victims E, G, J, and K correspond to the facts charged of this case and each of the above statements is not likely to be false, the victim E submitted a written diagnosis of injury corresponding to them, and the defendant was not guilty of committing each of the crimes of this case. However, the police led to the confession of all of the crimes of this case except a partial intimidation to J. However, the prosecutor again led to the confession by the prosecution that the crime of intimidation against the victim J and obstruction of the performance of official duties against K, and the crime of injury to the victim E committed each of the crimes of this case. In full view of the facts that there is no circumstance to suspect the above confession, it can be sufficiently recognized that the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

B. It is recognized that the victim E and K have agreed on the argument of unfair sentencing, the degree of injury of the victim E is minor, the obstruction of performance of official duties and intimidation is relatively minor, and the punishment of the crime of interference with business for the last ten years is not imposed other than the punishment of a fine for the crime of interference with business.

However, without any particular reason, the crime of each of the crimes of this case is not good, such as intimidation, interference with the performance of official duties of the public health clinic, etc., by the defendant without any justifiable reason, and the criminal records of the same violent crime of the same kind are three times.