The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is the person who is the chairperson of the practical labor union B.

In May 19, 2016, the Defendant, through a person in charge of the labor union, provided that “business purposephones and the role of the labor union” for the purpose of slandering victims D, etc., who are the heads of the cooperatives of the above Corporation C on the B’s internal computer network through a person in charge of the labor union, who gives money free of the price for the match.”

In other words, this is a bribe.

From now to now, the results have appeared.

It is not easy to see that the 3-year-old young children will also be able to see.

If an association development fund has not received a long amount, it has received an amount of money equivalent to 200,000 won per person to reduce welfare points.

However, as C himself made it clear, it would be suffering from the partnership development fund, and as a result, the members will be regarded as damages to the employee.

Above all, it is because the trade union's name that should be transparent and clean has received unfair money and gave up the rights and interests of the union members and employees would no longer perform the role of the trade union.

C has waived the role of trade union because of a few rates of interest in the phone for business.

The phrase “the above union has undermined the honor of the victim by putting a false fact on the part of the union, as it did not play a role in receiving a bribe in connection with the phone for business purposes.

2. Applicable to the facts charged for judgment: The judgment dismissing the prosecution that the withdrawal of a complaint in which the victim's intention not to punish is expressed after the prosecution is instituted pursuant to Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of the Use of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act).