logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.01.18 2016고단4951
부정수표단속법위반
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

However, the Defendants are above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A as the representative director of the “F” corporation, fishery products and rice Do and retail chain, A entered into a check contract with the Suup Bank in the name of the F corporation on April 1, 2014 and entered into a check contract with the same branch in the Suup Bank in the name of the F corporation.

Defendant

A, on April 21, 2015, decided to transfer the above corporation F to Defendant B and G in KRW 100 million, and then from G, “B may enter into a check contract with Busan Bank after one month from the date it is possible to enter into a check contract with the Busan Bank. In this case, the representative director may be transferred.

As a funeral service need to be carried out, “A’s request to allow A to issue a check in the name of F Co., Ltd. recorded as the representative director” was made after hearing horses, and Defendant B and G lent a blank check and seal impression, etc. to Defendant B and G, and Defendant B and G conspired to issue a check in the name of F Co., Ltd. recorded as the representative director.

Defendant

A has a blank check and seal impression, etc. on June 3, 2015, Defendant B, and G issued one check in the name of F Co., Ltd., the representative director on July 3, 2015, which was the date of issuance, to Defendant B and B, using the aforesaid blank check, seal impression, etc. at the I office operated by Defendant B in Yangsan-si operated by the Defendant B, Yangsan-si on the basis of the above blank check, etc., and the check number “J”, face value 36,280,000 won at the face value, and one check in the name of F Co., Ltd., the date of issuance, which was the date of presentation, was presented by the holder on July 3, 2015, which was within the payment period, but

In collusion with G on June 2015, the Defendants issued seven copies of the check at the same branch of the F Suhyup Bank Co., Ltd., the representative director of the Defendant, as indicated in the list of offenses in the attached Form, in collusion with G, and presented the check within the period for presentation, but the check holders did not receive the suspension of transaction.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each accusation;

1. A copy of a certificate, a business registration certificate, and a part of registered matters; and

arrow