The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

1. Summary of the facts charged in this case and the judgment of the court below

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, along with his name infinite, misrepresented the investigative agency to withdraw money to the victim E by leaving a telephone, and let the victim E keep the money in the vicinity of the house laundry, entices the victim outside of the house to hold the house, and conspired to steal money by inducing the Defendant to enter the house and bring money to the house.

Accordingly, on April 10, 2017, the person who is not eligible for the name is the victim who resides in Heak-gu, Soak-gu, Soak-gu, Goak-gu and called the victim's crime of "Cheongju Police Station."

The bank employees ordered that the bank employees should take all risk-free deposits as they can make a misappropriation of personal information and make the bank employees deduct the deposits. The victim should take a photograph of the cash amounting to KRW 9,300,000,000,000 in Cheongri-gu, the cash amounting to KRW 9.3 million in Cheongri-gu, the cash amounting to KRW 2,000,000 in neighboring agricultural cooperatives, and KRW 7,500,000 in cash from the one bank near the Measures Station, and then have the victim take a face of the cash amounting to the victim’s house.

Before causing a photograph of a resident registration certificate, a criminal charge should be examined and enter the house, and the entrance password of the entrance is requested to be known to the victim, and the victim was sent out of the house, and the victim was sent out of the house, and on April 14:30, 2017, after the victim went out of the house, the defendant was informed of the victim's personal identification number and entered inside the house of the victim.

The cash amounting to KRW 18.8 million, which was in the vicinity of the table, was stolen.

Accordingly, the Defendant conspiredd with the victim's name in collusion with the victim's residence, and stolen the cash of 18.8 million won owned by the victim.

B. The judgment of the court below is authorized to enter the victim's house because the above-mentioned person was informed of the victim's house password.