1. As to the Plaintiff’s KRW 275,00,000 and KRW 11,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 275,00,000 from May 23, 2014, and KRW 264,00,00.

1. The plaintiff is a company that conducts urban planning service business and design business of civil engineering, etc., and the defendant is a company that conducts the design and supervision business of the building. The defendant entered into a design service contract with the new sub-ju 2 apartment complex reconstruction project association around February 2007 about the reconstruction project of the new sub-joint housing complex (hereinafter "the construction of this case"). After that, around March 2009, the defendant entered into a technical service contract with the plaintiff about the authorization for the reconstruction project implementation of the construction of this case and the design of civil engineering (including value-added tax) with the service cost of KRW 275,00,000 (including value-added tax) on the date of the contract, the remaining amount of KRW 264,00,000 (including value-added tax) on the date of selection of the construction of the new sub-ju 2,00,000 (including value-added tax) on the date of the contract, and there is no dispute between the parties to the construction of this case and the defendant.

According to the facts found above, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff the service price of KRW 275,00,000 and the down payment of KRW 11,000,000 from May 23, 2014 to the date of conclusion of the above service contract, and with respect to the remainder of KRW 264,00,000 from May 24, 2014 to the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case from May 28, 2014 to the date of full payment, 6% per annum from May 28, 2016 to the date of delivery of a copy of the complaint of this case, and damages for delay calculated at the rate of KRW 15% per annum as prescribed by the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the following day to the

(A) The Plaintiff filed a claim for late payment damages for the remainder 264,00,000 won from May 23, 2014; however, the Defendant is liable for delay for the remainder from May 24, 2014 following the date the Plaintiff was selected as the contractor of the instant construction project. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim for this portion is without merit).