Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 8, 2013, Nonparty CFC (hereinafter “CF”) was a juristic person established pursuant to the Credit Unions Act, and was merged with the Defendant. On October 6, 1997, the Plaintiff entered the said CF and served as an agent responsible for the CF credit management.
B. On November 25, 2010, the Newcom Bank executed a loan of KRW 4.035 billion in total to D, E, F, G, H, I, J, and K (hereinafter referred to as “instant loan”) (hereinafter “instant loan”), and eight persons, including E, etc., at the time of the instant loan, purchased from L L L L to offer land in the wife population M as the owner of the said land (hereinafter “instant land”).
C. However, due to the dispute over internal representative authority among the above sentence, the seller of the land of this case, the application for the registration of ownership transfer was rejected in the future of the E and eight other parties on the land of this case, and C new Cooperatives cannot register the establishment of a neighboring mortgage on the land of this case.
On November 201, 201, the Credit Cooperative Federation conducted a sectoral inspection on the CB, and on May 2, 2012, the CB requested disciplinary dismissal against the Plaintiff on grounds of the grounds of the grounds for disciplinary action, such as “(i) volume of dealing with the instant loan in relation to the instant loan, ② excessive handling of the same person’s loan limit in relation to the instant loan, ③ unfair refund of players interest, ④ refund of N,O, and interest reduction and exemption in relation to the instant loan,” etc. (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”).
E. On August 20, 2012, according to the above disciplinary dismissal request, the CFF adopted a disciplinary dismissal order against the Plaintiff on August 20, 2012, and notified the Plaintiff of the result of the resolution (hereinafter “the first dismissal order”), and CF reported the Plaintiff’s loss of insured status as the employment insurance against the Plaintiff on August 21, 2012.
The Plaintiff was the first.