logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.15 2017나2050622
지체상금 등 청구
Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) are dismissed.

2. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant) A.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Defendant newly constructed a neighboring E shopping mall (hereinafter referred to as “instant shopping mall”) on the D ground of Pakistan, and sold to the Plaintiff some sections of the instant shopping mall building, an aggregate building, around May 2013, as follows:

(2) On July 27, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant drafted a sales contract (Evidence A No. 1) on July 27, 2012, and around May 2013, written a contract to modify the contract (the date of preparation was retroactive to July 27, 2012; hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

(3) Where the sales price of the instant sales contract is 138.86.684, 418, 300 428,683, 683.685, 696, 690 174, 970, 691.103, 27.6240, 80.90, 819, 6305, 808.24, 808, 808.201, 74.07.207, 208.207, 208, 209, 207.4, 208, 207, 208, 201, 30.7, 201, 207, 305, 207, 208, 200, 304, 3004, 2007, 307, 2309, 2074

Since then, the defendant entered into a contract on the design and supervision for the new construction of the G architect office and the instant commercial building.

Accordingly, around August 2013, H drafted the implementation drawings (hereinafter “instant implementation drawings”) and thereby obtained permission from the competent authority as to the said construction works.

On June 24, 2014, the Defendant entered into an agreement with Plaintiff A to modify the instant sales contract (hereinafter “instant amendment agreement”).

The agreement prepared at the time is below '.'.

arrow