beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as 5% per annum from September 20, 2019 to October 15, 2020 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. On August 5, 2019, the Plaintiff leased from the Defendant for the period of August 19, 202, a deposit of KRW 200,00,000,00, monthly rent of rent, KRW 7,50,000, and the period of August 19, 2021, the second basement E of “D”, a building for the ground of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for KRW 104.67 square meters, and KRW 47.06 square meters.
(hereinafter “Lease of this case.” According to the instant lease agreement, a lessor may repay an intermediate payment to a lessor before the lessee pays an intermediate payment to the lessor, and the lessee may waive the down payment and rescind this contract.
(6) A lessor or lessee may, if the contractual terms are not fulfilled, notify in writing the person who has failed to perform the contractual terms and conditions and may rescind the contract.
In such cases, the parties to the contract may respectively claim damages from the rescission of the contract to the other party, and the contract deposit shall be deemed to be the basis for compensation for damages, unless otherwise agreed on the damages (Article 7). (Reasons for Recognition)
2. The Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant cancelled the instant lease agreement. As such, the Plaintiff sought reimbursement of KRW 40,000,000, a double payment of KRW 20,000,000, pursuant to Article 6 of the instant lease agreement.
3. 판단 갑 제2호증, 을 제1, 3, 4호증의 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하여 보면, 이 사건 임대차계약 당시 특약사항 제8조로 ‘찜질방 용역계약(보증금 6,500만원, 월 650만원)은 현상태대로 임차인이 승계’하기로 약정한 사실, 그러나 원고는 이 사건 임대차계약을 전후한 2020. 8. 4.부터 같은 달 7.까지 인터넷 구직 사이트에 여탕 매점, 부황좌욕실면도, 스낵, 마사지, 세신, 이발, 매점 등 용역을 구한다는 글을 게시한 사실, 이에 피고는 2019. 8. 16. '이 사건 임대차계약이 용역승계 문제로 진행되고 있지 않으므로 잔금지급일인 2019. 8. 20. 잔금 지급이 되지 않더라도 이미 지급받은...