1. The Defendant’s KRW 84,328,59 for the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from September 25, 2012 to July 25, 2014.

1. Presumed factual basis

가. 피고는 2012. 9. 25. 04:30경 서울 서대문구 C에 있는 D 편의점 앞길에서 원고와 서로 시비하다가 원고로부터 주먹으로 얼굴을 1대 맞게 되자 화가 나 주먹으로 원고의 얼굴 등을 때리고, 위 편의점 안으로 들어가 진열장에 놓여 있던 위험한 물건인 문구용 커터 칼(전체길이 약 14cm, 칼날길이 약 12cm)을 들고 밖으로 나와 원고의 얼굴, 어깨, 팔, 등 부위 등을 향하여 마구 휘둘러 원고에게 약 5주간의 치료가 필요한 안와벽 골절, 귓바퀴 열상, 얼굴 열상 등을 가하였다

(hereinafter “instant injury”). B.

On November 14, 2012, the Defendant was convicted of imprisonment with prison labor for one year and six months due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective crime, deadly weapon, etc.) with respect to the act of injury, etc. in this case by this court was sentenced to a judgment of conviction on November 14, 2012; however, on January 17, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for ten months at the appellate court (No. 2012No1346). The said judgment was finalized through the final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2013Do1336).

C. The Plaintiff suffered from an injury, such as the pelle of the inner wall, the pelle part, the pelle part, the chest part, and the upper part, etc., due to the instant accident, and there was a chronic disorder in the gale of the gale reflect.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6, 12, 14, and 15 (including branch numbers, if any; hereinafter the same shall apply), Gap evidence Nos. 13, the images of Gap evidence No. 13, the result of the physical examination entrusted to the director of the Central University Hospital of this Court, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts of recognition of the above liability for damages, the defendant suffered injury, such as an injury to the plaintiff by the act of injury in this case, and thus, the defendant is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the above tort in accordance with Article 750 of the Civil Act.

B. Limit of liability, however, the instant injury occurred between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, while the Plaintiff and the Defendant were in sight of each other.