Text
1. The Plaintiff:
(a) Defendant B, C, D, and E deliver real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos 1 and 2;
B. Defendant F shall be.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association whose project area covers 63,231 square meters in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and is authorized by the head of Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to establish the association on December 30, 2008, the authorization to implement the project on September 26, 2013, and the authorization to implement the management and disposal plan on May 7, 2015. The head of Eunpyeong-gu publicly notified the details of the above management and disposal plan on the same day
B. Defendants B, C, D, and E shared 3/10, 3/10, 2/10, 2/10, 2/10, and 2/10 shares of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2, respectively. Defendant F owned and resided in the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 4, and all were eligible for cash settlement because they did not apply for parcelling-out within the period of application for parcelling-out.
C. On July 24, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for adjudication of expropriation with the competent local Land Expropriation Committee (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City Land Expropriation Committee”) in order not to reach an agreement on compensation for losses on each of the above real estate, and the said Committee rendered a adjudication of expropriation that, on September 11, 2015, the date of expropriation was determined as of September 24, 2015, the Plaintiff expropriated each of the land and obstacles within the project zone, and the amount of compensation for losses to Defendant B, D, and E is determined as KRW 119,876,930, respectively, and the amount of compensation for losses to Defendant D, and F is determined as KRW 417,693,060.
On September 9, 2015, according to the above acceptance ruling, the Plaintiff deposited each of the above compensation for losses for the Defendants.
(Seoul Western District Court 2015 Geum 3924-7). D.
On December 2, 2015, the Plaintiff deposited KRW 20,135,433 in total for Defendant F (i.e., relocation settlement money of KRW 12,00,000,000 for residential relocation expenses of KRW 6,829,162 for movable property transfer expenses of KRW 1,306,271).
(Seoul Western District Court 2015No. 5290) / [Grounds for Recognition] Gap 1 through 11 (including each number)
2. Determination
A. Cause of claim: (i) Article 49(6) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) shall apply to the previous land or structure when the approval of the management and disposal plan is publicly notified.