A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On December 23, 2003, the Defendant was sentenced to ten years of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment of Sexual Crimes and the Protection of Victims, etc. (Special Robbery, Rape, etc.) at the Cheongju District Court on September 30, 2013, and the execution of the sentence is terminated in the Cheongju Prison on September 30, 2013. On June 7, 2017, the judgment became final and conclusive on September 29, 2017 after being sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (special robbery, Rape, etc.) by the same court on August 24, 2018, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 16, 2019.

From around 2015 to 2016, the Defendant had a resistant relationship with the victim B (n, 41 years of age) who was an elementary school.

1. On April 30, 2016, the Defendant called the victim with his/her spouse at an insular location, saying, “I will spread his/her photograph without sending the money.” This was fluent by phoneing the victim with his/her spouse at an insular location.”

On April 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received KRW 2 million from a new bank account (C) in the name of the Defendant from the victim who frighted the victim and frighted the victim; and (b) received delivery of KRW 2 million from the said victim.

2. Around May 27, 2016, the Defendant committed a crime, stating that “A victim, who has a spouse at an insular location, has a dynamic image in Korea, and to delete it, requires money to be deleted.”

Around May 27, 2016, the Defendant got delivery of KRW 3 million to the new bank account (C) in the name of the Defendant, around May 27, 2016, to the victim who frighted the victim and frighted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness B and D;

1. The protocol of each prosecutorial statement concerning B and D (the statement of the witness is consistent, specific and contradictory to each other; in particular, it is recognized that the video of B had existed by the statement of D).

1. The inquiry of criminal records, etc. and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (Attachment to criminal records of a suspect);